Past
Projects: Program Evaluation
Check out a selection of our best and most recent projects.
Violence impacts youth in complex and unpredictable ways, at both the individual and societal level. What data can we use to learn how our efforts are working to protect youth from violence and its harmful impacts?

Multnomah County had a novel approach to charging serious crimes that included a conference between the judge, defendant, district attorney, defense attorney, and the probation officer. This was designed to create more individualized probation plans and provide the judge with more information about what would happen once the defendant plead guilty. We interviewed several judges, defendants, district attorneys, and defense attorneys to understand what was working well and what adjustments might be helpful in the program.

Child Care Subsidy for Working Parents
A policy change increasing and improving ERDC (Employment-Related Day Care), an Oregon child care subsidy for working parents, allowed an opportunity to examine the impact of this newly generous program. We found that most parents experienced such inconsistency in the subsidy and other government supports, along with unreliable income, that they did not notice the change; however, day care providers did, and many reported that they were able to continue serving kids through the subsidy because of the change.

Past Projects: Data Analysis
Check out a selection of our best and most recent projects.
American Civil Liberties Union – Oregon: Performance Measurement, Data Analysis, and Policy Analysis.
Using a large dataset of misdemeanor and felony convictions in Oregon, together with ACLU-OR we worked to create a set of metrics for judging District Attorneys and their policies that moved beyond conviction rates. We identified data points that reflect community values and a more holistic approach to public safety.

How do subtle changes in the court’s interpretation of specific crimes affect who is charged with drug delivery? Can we use existing data to see whether people are treated differently based on their race, or based on when and where they were charged? Using a sample of case files, we estimated the impact of a court decision that broadened the criteria for drug delivery. We also looked at whether this was being applied in unconstitutional ways. This work appears in an amicus brief (State v. Hubbell, 2023).

Oregon Public Defense Services: Data Analysis Evaluation and Strategy for Forecasting.
OPDS had just starting using a new system for assigning work to public defenders, and hired us to figure out how to project caseload numbers for the new system using information from the previous (completely different) system. A very fun project! We also did a quality audit of all of their data systems and made suggestions for how they could get more helpful insights from their data.
